Home › Accreditation › Process & Timeline
Accreditation

Process & timeline

From first contact to a published decision takes most programs nine to twelve months, and most of that time is yours: preparing the self-study. The review itself is a defined sequence with fixed turnaround commitments on our side.

9–12months, application to decision
7steps, each with a written output
5years before reaccreditation
Overhead view of appointments being written on a calendar — the ICPCAS accreditation process and timeline for care training programs
The seven steps

What happens, in order

Step1

Eligibility review

A free, non-binding check that your program meets the seven threshold requirements. Send a curriculum outline, instructor list and student policies.

  • Written response within 15 business days
  • Three outcomes: ready to apply, ready for Candidacy, or a list of gaps
  • Nothing is recorded or published
2–3 weekstypical duration
You, then ICPCAS staffwho does the work
Eligibility letterwhat you receive
Step2

Application

Submit the application form, organizational documents and the application fee for your tier. Your program is assigned an accreditation coordinator and gains portal access.

  • Application fee is non-refundable and fixed in advance
  • Linked applications for additional programs are submitted together
  • Portal opens with the self-study template for your discipline
1–2 weekstypical duration
Your programwho does the work
Portal access & coordinatorwhat you receive
Step3

Self-study

The core of the process. You document, standard by standard, how the program meets each requirement, with evidence: syllabi, instructor files, assessment instruments, policies, student outcomes.

  • Template provided; most programs need 60–120 hours of staff time
  • Coordinator answers questions throughout; two optional check-in calls
  • Submitted electronically; no printing
3–5 monthstypical duration
Your programwho does the work
Completed self-studywhat you receive
Step4

Document review

Two trained reviewers, screened for conflicts, read the self-study independently and then together, scoring each standard and listing clarification requests.

  • Reviewers never from your region or market where feasible
  • One consolidated clarification list; you have 30 days to respond
  • Reviewers may request a sample of student records and assessments
6–8 weekstypical duration
ICPCAS reviewerswho does the work
Clarification listwhat you receive
Step5

Site or virtual review

A structured review visit: interviews with leadership, instructors, current students and recent graduates; observation of instruction; inspection of records. Virtual by default; on-site when the program delivers in person and the standards require observation.

  • One to two days
  • Agenda shared three weeks in advance
  • Travel for on-site reviews billed at cost, capped
1–2 days (week 30–34)typical duration
ICPCAS reviewerswho does the work
Reviewer report (draft)what you receive
Step6

Report & response

You receive the reviewers' full report, including any findings of non-compliance, and have 30 days to correct factual errors and submit a response or evidence of correction.

  • Response becomes part of the record
  • No new evidence after the response window closes
  • The reviewers do not make the decision
30 daystypical duration
Your programwho does the work
Final reviewer reportwhat you receive
Step7

Decision & publication

The Accreditation Review Committee decides on the written record and issues a decision letter with findings. Adverse decisions carry a 30-day appeal right. Outcomes are published in the directory and the actions register.

  • Committee meets six times a year
  • Decision letter within 15 business days of the meeting
  • Accredited programs receive the mark, certificate and directory listing
4–8 weekstypical duration
Accreditation Review Committeewho does the work
Decision letter, mark & listingwhat you receive
On a calendar

A typical twelve months

Shaded by who is working. Your self-study preparation is the longest block and the one you control; our review stages have fixed turnaround commitments.

StageM1M2M3M4M5M6M7M8M9M10M11M12
Eligibility review
Application & fee
Self-study preparation
Document review
Clarification requests
Site or virtual review
Reviewer report
Program response
Committee decision
Appeal window (if any)
Publication
ICPCAS reviewersYour programCommission decision
Outcomes

Four possible decisions

AccreditedMeets all standards, or has minor findings with an accepted correction plan. Five-year term with an annual report.
Accredited with conditionsMeets most standards; specific findings must be corrected within 6–12 months and verified by a focused review. Listed as Accredited with the conditions noted.
DeferredThe record is insufficient to decide. The program is given a defined period to supply evidence. Not published as an adverse action.
DeniedSubstantial non-compliance. Published, with a 30-day appeal right and a 12-month wait before reapplying. Written findings explain exactly why.
Jotting dates in a desk calendar — after accreditation, ICPCAS programs file an annual report and reaccredit every five years
After the decision

Staying accredited

  • Annual report. A short report each year on enrollment, completions, instructor changes, complaints received and any substantive changes. Due on the anniversary of accreditation.
  • Substantive change. Changes to ownership, discipline, delivery format, lead instructors or instructional hours of more than 20% must be reported within 30 days and may trigger a focused review.
  • Complaints. Anyone may file a complaint about an accredited program. The program is notified, given a chance to respond, and the matter is resolved under the published procedure.
  • Reaccreditation. A full review every five years, lighter than the initial review where the record is clean. Begins in year four.
  • Withdrawal. Programs may withdraw voluntarily at any time; the status change is published.
Reviewers

Who reviews your program

Reviewers are experienced practitioners, educators and evaluators who complete ICPCAS reviewer training, sign the conflict-of-interest policy and are screened for every assignment. At least one reviewer on each team practices or teaches in the discipline under review; where the program is taught in a language other than English, at least one reviewer is fluent in it.

Reviewers evaluate and report. They do not decide. Their honorarium is fixed and does not depend on the outcome.

Instructor and adult learners in a library session — ICPCAS reviewers are practicing educators and practitioners in the discipline they review
Frequently asked

About the process

Can we speed this up?

The parts we control have fixed maximum turnarounds and we meet them. The part you control, the self-study, can be done in six weeks by a well-documented program or take a year. The honest answer is that the fastest programs are the ones that read the standards before they apply.

Is the review virtual or on site?

Virtual by default. On-site review is required when the program delivers in person and the standards require direct observation of instruction or a practicum, or when the document review raises questions only a visit can resolve. Travel for on-site reviews is billed at cost and capped.

What if the reviewers get something wrong?

You see the full report before any decision and have 30 days to correct factual errors and respond. The Committee reads your response alongside the report. If the final decision is adverse, you may appeal to a panel with no prior involvement.

Who sees our self-study?

Your two assigned reviewers, your coordinator, the Accreditation Review Committee and, on appeal, the Appeals Panel. Self-studies are confidential; only the decision and findings summary are published.

What happens between decisions?

Accredited programs file a short annual report and notify us of substantive changes. There is no annual inspection unless a complaint, a reported change or the annual report triggers a focused review.

How often does the Committee meet?

Six times a year. Your file goes to the first meeting after your response window closes. Decision letters are issued within 15 business days of the meeting.

Next

What it costs, with nothing hidden